Skip to content
AI Literacy
Lektion 2 von 170/17 abgeschlossen
KI-Grundlagen & Regulierung

EU AI Act & Risk Classes

VerbotenHochrisikoBegrenztMinimal

🖱️ Interaktiv: Ziehen zum Drehen · Lektion 2

Learning objectives

After this lesson you will be able to:

  • Name and distinguish the four risk classes of the EU AI Act
  • Give examples of prohibited, high-risk and low-risk AI systems
  • Determine your role as a provider or deployer
  • Assess the consequences of violating the EU AI Act

The EU AI Act at a glance

The EU AI Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689) is the world's first comprehensive regulation of artificial intelligence. It entered into force on 2 February 2025 and is being implemented step by step.

Goal: AI systems should be safe, transparent and legally compliant — without unnecessarily hampering innovation.

💡 Key deadlines

• 2 February 2025 — entry into force; Art. 4 AI literacy is now law • 3 August 2026 — enforcement powers for national authorities • 2 February 2025 — prohibited AI practices (Art. 5) take effect • December 2027 — high-risk obligations (deferred by the Digital Omnibus)

The four risk classes

The EU AI Act follows a risk-based approach:

1. Prohibited (unacceptable risk)

Systems that violate fundamental EU rights:

  • Social scoring by government agencies
  • Manipulative AI systems (subliminal techniques)
  • Real-time biometrics in public spaces (with narrow exceptions)
  • Emotion recognition in workplaces

2. High risk

Systems with significant impact on safety or rights:

  • AI in critical infrastructure
  • Medical devices with AI
  • Biometric identification systems
  • AI in recruiting, creditworthiness, border control
  • AI in law enforcement contexts

3. Limited risk

Systems with transparency obligations:

  • Chatbots (must be labeled as AI)
  • Deepfakes and synthetic content (labeling obligation)

4. Minimal risk

All other AI systems that trigger no specific obligations:

  • AI-based games
  • Spam filters
  • Product recommendations

📝 Schnellprüfung

Which risk class applies to AI that pre-screens job applications?

Provider vs. deployer — your role

Provider: develops an AI system or places it on the EU market Deployer: uses an AI system within their own organization

Most organizations in the EU are deployers — they use AI tools such as ChatGPT, Copilot or specialized AI applications.

As a deployer you must:

  • Train all employees in AI literacy (Art. 4)
  • Document the AI systems in use
  • Provide human oversight for high-risk systems
  • Be transparent toward affected persons

🏢 Praxis-Szenario: Determining risk classes in a company

Your company plans three AI deployments: 1) A chatbot for customer inquiries, 2) A facial recognition system for access control, 3) A tool for automatically sorting job applications. Which risk classes apply?

Enforcement and sanctions

  • Up to €35 million or 7% of worldwide annual turnover (prohibited practices)
  • Up to €15 million or 3% (high-risk obligation violations)
  • Up to €7.5 million or 1.5% (misleading statements)

National supervision in Germany is handled by the Bundesnetzagentur.

💡 Art. 4 applies to everyone

Unlike the high-risk obligations, Art. 4 AI literacy applies to ALL organizations that use AI — regardless of risk class or company size. SMEs are not exempt either.

✅ Wichtige Erkenntnisse

Haken setzen, um deinen Lernfortschritt zu markieren:

→ Go deeper: Permitted & prohibited uses — which AI practices are banned · Transparency obligations — labeling and documentation duties

Weiterführende Inhalte

Vollständiger KI-Kompetenz-Guide

Relevante Rechtsgrundlagen: Art. 4 · Art. 5 · Art. 6